🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.